Marshall Geisser Law | Large Image
599
paged,page-template,page-template-blog-large-image,page-template-blog-large-image-php,page,page-id-599,page-child,parent-pageid-1815,paged-114,page-paged-114,qode-quick-links-1.0,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-11.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.2.1,vc_responsive
 

Large Image

The petition of the day is: Johnson v. Stinson 17-749 Issues: (1) Whether Johnson v. Jones precludes a federal appellate court from exercising jurisdiction over a challenge to a denial of qualified immunity that turns not upon disputed facts, but upon the disputed application of the inferences drawn...

From Monday’s district court decision in Hinds v. United States Government (E.D. Mo.): In February 16, 2017, [self-represented] Plaintiff filed a 548-page pro se complaint, in which Plaintiff contends that by virtue of the Tax Code, the Government has established an institutionalized faith and religion of...